Proof of Stake Markets
A (light explanation) of a Novel Approach at Decoupling Liquidity and Security for PoS Networks via an Atomic and Permissionless SSO.
Abstract
In this study, we propose a novel 'Stake Markets' model for the Solana blockchain, which facilitates the trading of security tokens through a single-sided order book without necessitating the unstaking of tokens. This model maintains network security and offers a dynamic marketplace where security tokens can be traded permissionlessly at various rates. Our approach addresses the fundamental limitations of existing proof of stake (PoS) networks where security tokens are often locked in stake accounts, creating liquidity constraints and potential security vulnerabilities during large transactions selling existing stakes. By enabling continuous liquidity and secure transactions of delegated stakes, this system potentially revolutionizes the economic dynamics of PoS networks.
Introduction
Proof of Stake: Context and Significance
Proof of Stake (PoS) has emerged as a pivotal technology in the blockchain landscape, offering a more energy-efficient alternative to the Proof of Work (PoW) models traditionally used by networks like Bitcoin. Unlike PoW, which requires vast amounts of computational power to secure transactions and create new blocks, PoS achieves security through the staking of tokens by network participants. This not only reduces energy consumption but also leverages economic stake to maintain network integrity. As blockchain technology continues to evolve, the role of PoS has become increasingly crucial, particularly in networks that prioritize scalability and environmental sustainability.
Limitations of Current Proof of Stake Mechanisms
However, current implementations of PoS come with inherent limitations that can hinder their operational efficiency and economic fluidity. One significant challenge is the lack of liquidity caused by the locking of tokens in staking contracts. In traditional PoS systems, tokens must be staked for a duration, during which they cannot be easily traded or liquidated, leading to potential liquidity constraints for stakeholders. Moreover, the process of unstaking to conduct transactions can introduce security vulnerabilities, as reducing the amount of actively staked tokens may lower the network's resistance to attacks, such as the nothing-at-stake problem.
Introduction to 'Stake Markets'
To address these issues, we introduce the 'Stake Markets' model for the Solana blockchain—a novel approach that incorporates a single-sided order book to facilitate the trading of security tokens without requiring them to be unstaked. This model allows for real-time trading and liquidity of staked tokens while preserving the security and operational integrity of the network. By enabling stakeholders to sell or buy staked tokens at market-driven rates without the traditional wait times associated with unstaking, 'Stake Markets' provide a robust solution to the liquidity and security challenges faced by current PoS systems.
Objectives
This paper aims to:
Elucidate the structural and functional principles of the 'Stake Markets' model.
Demonstrate through theoretical analysis and simulation how this model can maintain or enhance network security while increasing liquidity.
Explore the implications of this model for the economic dynamics of the Solana network and potentially other PoS networks.
Offer a comprehensive evaluation of the benefits and potential risks associated with the implementation of 'Stake Markets.'
By the conclusion of this paper, the reader will gain an in-depth understanding of how 'Stake Markets' can revolutionise the trading of staked assets, offering a scalable and secure method that could be adopted across various compatible PoS networks.
Proof of Stake Networks and Solana’s Unique Approach
Proof of Stake networks fundamentally differ in their approach to achieving consensus and securing transactions compared to Proof of Work systems. By requiring validators to hold and "stake" their tokens as a form of security deposit, PoS networks ensure that validators have a vested interest in maintaining network integrity. Solana, a prominent leader in this technology, enhances this model by incorporating features like Proof of History (PoH) and a uniquely designed consensus algorithm that significantly improves throughput and reduces latency.
Solana's staking mechanism involves delegating SOL tokens to validators, who process transactions and run the network. This delegation not only helps secure the network but also allows token holders to earn rewards proportional to their stake. However, once staked, these tokens are typically locked in for an agreed period, during which they cannot be traded, thus impacting liquidity.
Economic and Security Implications of Staking
Staking tokens in a PoS network like Solana creates a double-edged sword: it significantly enhances network security by incentivizing token holders and validators to act honestly, but it also introduces economic challenges, particularly regarding liquidity. The immobilization of significant portions of tokens in staking contracts reduces the overall market fluidity and can make it difficult for stakeholders to respond to market conditions swiftly.
Moreover, the security of PoS networks is contingent upon the proportion of staked tokens; a high stake concentration typically implies greater security. Thus, practices like unstaking to sell tokens could temporarily weaken the network’s defense against certain types of attacks, such as 51% attacks, where a bad actor could gain control if a significant amount of staked tokens is suddenly withdrawn.
The Necessity of Decoupling Security and Liquidity
The proposal for 'Stake Markets' addresses these critical issues by allowing for the fluid trading of staked tokens without the need to unstake, thereby decoupling liquidity from security. This model is particularly pertinent for networks like Solana, where rapid transaction processing and high throughput are critical. The ability to trade staked positions without affecting the underlying security structure of the network could dramatically alter the economic landscape, allowing stakeholders greater flexibility and potentially increasing the overall security by maintaining or even increasing the amount of staked tokens.Total meaningful volume also increases, as previously dormant capital can now be transacted while maintaining its purpose.
Decoupling Liquidity and Security in Proof of Stake Networks
The Concept of Decoupling
In traditional financial systems, liquidity and security often have an inverse relationship: higher liquidity can mean lower security and vice versa. In blockchain networks, particularly those based on PoS, this relationship has historically been rigid due to the staking mechanisms in place. Staked tokens, which secure the network by deterring dishonest behavior through economic incentives, are typically locked up, rendering them illiquid. This locking up of assets results in a substantial barrier to achieving fluid market dynamics, reduces total volume on the network and other such factors.
Solutions to Decoupling
Historically, this problem has been partially solved on PoS networks via the use of Liquid Staked Tokens. Liquid staked tokens represent a derivative-based solution in the blockchain ecosystem, designed to address the liquidity issues inherent in traditional staking mechanisms. These tokens are derivatives issued to stakers, representing the staked assets plus accrued rewards, which can then be traded, used as collateral, or engaged in other DeFi activities. This approach enables users to maintain liquidity while their original assets continue to secure the network.Â
However, this can introduce unnecessary risks with regards to the non-atomic nature of stake pool smart contracts (programs), issues with governance and upgradeability of stake pool programs, as well as inherent exploitation risks for redeemables in the reward reserves. There needs to co-exist an atomic-based model that allows for staked tokens (in our case, tokens securing the network) to be instantly liquidated while maintaining security and a complete lack of permission.
Alternative existing solutions to transacting stake have often been permission based, with the purpose of unstaking to replenish short term loss of liquid funds. An example of this is the unstake it pool from sanctum.so - where users can receive liquid Solana by sending their stake account to a private pool of SOL where this stake account will be unstaked. Although a useful primitive for the network, encouraging the use of such means as a way for instant liquidity on security only serves to lower the economic barrier to attack on the network. So, how to ‘Proof of Stake Markets’ aim to provide another solution to this issue?
An Atomic Co-Solution
The 'Stake Markets' model aims to innovate on proof of stake networks by introducing a new primitive for decoupling liquidity from security. Through a single-sided order book, stakeholders can maintain their tokens in a staked state—thereby continuously securing the network—while still being able to participate atomically in market transactions. This decoupling allows stakeholders to respond to market fluctuations more swiftly without compromising the underlying security of the network. Further use cases would be security markets for movements of large sets of security on a PoS network. For instance, an exchange winding down its validation services would require such a market to liquidate permissionlessly without the need for unstaking or permissioned environments of sale. Conversely, validators and stake pools can now bid on the open market for active security in which they can instantly delegate to their ventures.
How Stake Markets Function
At the core of the Stake Markets model lies an unordered, one-sided book of bids that exclusively records bids from potential buyers. These bids specify both the quantity and the rate at which buyers are willing to exchange liquid Solana for staked Solana. The design eliminates the need for traditional order matching systems, instead employing a permissionless interaction model where sellers independently engage with bids that meet their criteria.
The order book operates without on-chain cranks or complex sorting algorithms, which typically introduce latency and operational overhead in conventional trading systems. This minimalistic design ensures high throughput and low transaction costs, aligning with Solana’s efficiency goals.
Transactional Integrity and Atomicity
The Stake Markets model ensures transactional integrity through its atomic operation structure. When a stakeholder decides to sell their staked tokens, the transaction and all its associated operations—from bid selection to token transfer—are executed in a single blockchain transaction. This atomicity guarantees that the operations are indivisible and inseparable, ensuring that either all operations succeed or none at all, thereby protecting both parties against transaction failure or partial completion risks.
This mechanism is critical in maintaining trust and security within the system, as it allows stakeholders to verify and confirm transaction details prior to execution, minimising the risk of discrepancies and ensuring transparency.
Stake Markets as an Open, Foundational Primitive for StakeFi
To delve into why the Stake Markets model is uniquely suited to benefit the Solana blockchain and its distinctive stake account architecture, we must consider the operational similarities between Solana's stake accounts and Bitcoin's UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) model. This comparison highlights the innovative potential of Solana for developing new staking primitives that can transform the economic dynamics of PoS networks.
Solana's Stake Account Architecture
Solana's blockchain architecture introduces a novel approach to managing staked assets through what are called stake accounts. These accounts function similarly to Bitcoin’s UTXO model. In Bitcoin, the UTXO model treats each transaction output as an independent entity; these outputs are not merely balances but are treated as distinct coins that can be individually tracked and managed.
Similarly, in Solana, each stake account can be thought of as a discrete "note" or unit of currency. This unit holds a specific amount of staked SOL that is delegated to validators.
These stake accounts are inherently granular, meaning a single wallet can possess an unlimited number of stake accounts, each potentially associated with different validators and containing varying amounts of SOL. Furthermore, stake accounts on Solana can be split into smaller accounts or merged into larger ones, enhancing flexibility in how stakes are managed and reallocated.
Operational Flexibility and Security
This flexibility mirrors the UTXO model's advantages where each stake account can be individually managed, split, or merged without affecting other stake accounts in the wallet. This granularity allows for precise control over the staking and unstaking processes, and by extension, over liquidity management and risk exposure.
Uniqueness of Stake Markets to Solana
Utilizing Solana's Account Model
The Stake Markets model leverages this unique structure of stake accounts to facilitate a dynamic and secure trading environment. On Solana, because each stake account can be treated like a discrete, tradeable asset, it becomes feasible to implement a single-sided order book where each stake account, or portion thereof, can be traded independently.
Comparison with Other Blockchains
While other blockchains also implement staking, they generally do not offer the same level of operational flexibility as Solana. For instance, Ethereum’s staking involves a more aggregated approach where staked assets are pooled due to the 32 ETH requirement, and the notion of splitting or merging stakes is not as straightforward or granular. This difference in fundamental design makes the kind of rapid, flexible, and secure trading offered by Stake Markets uniquely possible on Solana (#OPOS)
Innovation Potential on Solana
Given Solana's stake account model, there is a vast landscape of potential staking primitives that could be explored and developed. These could include advanced trading mechanisms, specialized financial instruments based on staked assets, and more responsive staking liquidity management tools, all built on the foundational concept of stake accounts as unique, discrete entities. The Stake Markets model is just the beginning of what could be a new era of staking functionality in the blockchain space.
Conclusion
The Stake Markets model, with its single-sided order book, is uniquely enabled by the architecture of Solana's stake accounts, which provide the necessary flexibility and security. This approach not only enhances liquidity and market dynamics but also opens up a broader spectrum of financial innovations that can be specifically tailored to leverage the unique properties of Solana's blockchain technology. As such, while the concept of decoupling liquidity from security is broadly applicable, the specific mechanisms and efficiencies of the Stake Markets model are uniquely suited to and enabled by Solana's innovative staking architecture.
References
- Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. [online] Available at: http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2024].
- Buterin, V. (2014). A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. [online] Ethereum White Paper. Available at: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/ [Accessed 25 May 2024].
- King, S. and Nadal, S. (2012). PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake. [online] Available at: https://peercoin.net/assets/paper/peercoin-paper.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2024].
- Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger. [online] Ethereum Project Yellow Paper. Available at: https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2024].
- Solana Labs. (2021). Solana: High Performance Blockchain. [online] Available at: https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2024].